Select preferred providers

The first step in selecting preferred providers is to form and coordinate an evaluation panel. This panel is responsible for evaluating the offers received from bidders based on a set of pre-determined criteria. The panel members should have the appropriate knowledge and experience to assess the bids accurately, and they should not have any conflicts of interest.

Here is an example scenario of how to form and coordinate an evaluation panel:

Suppose an organisation needs to procure a new software system to manage its inventory, and it has received several bids from different vendors. To evaluate these bids, the organisation forms an evaluation panel consisting of five members, including:

1. Project Manager: Responsible for overseeing the procurement process and ensuring that it aligns with the organisation's strategic objectives.
2. IT Manager: Responsible for evaluating the technical aspects of the software and ensuring that it is compatible with the organisation's existing IT infrastructure.
3. Finance Manager: Responsible for evaluating the financial aspects of the bids and ensuring that they are within the organisation's budget.
4. Procurement Officer: Responsible for managing the procurement process, ensuring that it complies with organisational policies and procedures, and coordinating the panel's activities.
5. Subject Matter Expert: A specialist in inventory management software who can provide technical expertise and advice to the panel.

To coordinate the evaluation panel, the procurement officer should:

1. Schedule meetings and coordinate communication between panel members.
2. Develop a clear evaluation plan and ensure that all panel members understand their roles and responsibilities.
3. Provide the panel members with the bids to evaluate, along with the evaluation criteria and any relevant background information.
4. Ensure that the panel members evaluate the bids independently and avoid any conflicts of interest.
5. Facilitate the panel's discussions and decision-making process to arrive at a consensus on the preferred providers.
6. Document the panel's findings and recommendations for the procurement manager's approval.

By forming and coordinating an evaluation panel in this way, the organisation can ensure that the bids are evaluated objectively and fairly, and that the selected provider meets the organisation's requirements and budget.

The second step in selecting preferred providers is to evaluate the offers received from bidders based on an evaluation plan and organisational probity requirements. The evaluation plan should include the criteria and weightings used to assess the bids, while the probity requirements are designed to ensure that the evaluation process is fair, transparent, and impartial.

Here are some examples of how to evaluate offers according to the evaluation plan and organisational probity requirements:

By following these evaluation methods, an organisation can ensure that the selected provider meets the required criteria and that the evaluation process is transparent and fair. It can also help identify any weaknesses or gaps in the bids, allowing for further clarification and negotiation with the bidders before making the final decision.

Criteria and weightings used to assess bids

The criteria and weightings used to assess bids can vary depending on the specific requirements and objectives of the procurement process. Here are some examples of criteria and weightings that may be used to assess bids:

The weightings for each criterion may vary depending on the specific requirements of the procurement process and the objectives of the organisation. It is important that the weightings are allocated in a fair and transparent manner, and that they reflect the relative importance of each criterion to the organisation's objectives.

The third step in selecting preferred providers is to obtain specialist expertise where necessary to assist with the evaluation of offers. Depending on the complexity of the procurement, the evaluation panel may require additional expertise or technical knowledge to properly evaluate the bids received.

Here are some examples of when and how to obtain specialist expertise:

1. Technical expertise: If the procurement involves a technical product or service, such as IT systems or engineering services, the evaluation panel may require the assistance of technical experts to assess the bids. For example, an IT specialist could be brought in to evaluate the technical capabilities of a software system or an engineer could assist with evaluating construction bids.
2. Legal expertise: If the procurement involves legal or regulatory requirements, such as compliance with data privacy regulations, the evaluation panel may require the assistance of legal experts. Legal experts can ensure that the evaluation process complies with relevant laws and regulations, and that the preferred provider is capable of meeting any legal obligations.
3. Financial expertise: If the procurement involves complex financial arrangements, such as leasing or financing, the evaluation panel may require the assistance of financial experts. Financial experts can evaluate the financial stability of the bidders, assess the affordability of the bids, and ensure that the preferred provider can meet any financial obligations.
4. Market research: If the procurement involves a new or unfamiliar product or service, the evaluation panel may require the assistance of market research experts to assess the viability and competitiveness of the bids. Market research experts can provide insight into market trends and help identify potential risks or opportunities.
5. Independent reviewers: In some cases, it may be necessary to bring in independent reviewers to assess the bids and provide an unbiased opinion. Independent reviewers can evaluate the bids against the evaluation criteria and provide an independent assessment of the preferred provider.

By obtaining specialist expertise, the evaluation panel can ensure that the bids are evaluated thoroughly and that the preferred provider meets all the required criteria. This can help identify any potential risks or issues with the bids and ensure that the procurement process is fair and transparent.

The fourth step in selecting preferred providers is to undertake clarification and negotiation of matters contained in offers with bidders. This step is important to ensure that the evaluation panel has a clear understanding of the bid and to clarify any ambiguities or inconsistencies in the proposal. It also provides an opportunity to negotiate the terms of the proposal to ensure that they meet the requirements of the organisation.

Here are some examples of how to undertake clarification and negotiation with bidders:

By undertaking clarification and negotiation with bidders, the evaluation panel can ensure that the bid meets all of the requirements and that the preferred provider is capable of delivering the required services or products. It can also help identify any potential issues or risks with the bid and ensure that the procurement process is fair and transparent. 

The fifth step in selecting preferred providers is to select the preferred provider(s) and develop, justify, and document recommendations for the allocation of business against selection criteria. This step involves evaluating the bids against the selection criteria and determining the preferred provider(s) that best meet the requirements of the organisation.

Here is the typical process followed how to select preferred providers and develop, justify, and document recommendations:

Step 1: Evaluate the bids

The evaluation panel should evaluate the bids against the selection criteria and determine which bidder(s) best meet the requirements of the organisation. The evaluation should be based on objective criteria, such as technical capabilities, price, experience, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Step 2: Develop recommendations

Once the preferred provider(s) have been identified, the evaluation panel should develop recommendations for the allocation of business. The recommendations should be based on the selection criteria and should justify why the preferred provider(s) best meet the requirements of the organisation.

Step 3: Document the recommendations

The recommendations should be documented in a report that includes the evaluation process, the selection criteria, the recommended preferred provider(s), and the justification for the recommendation. The report should be signed off by the evaluation panel and the relevant stakeholders.

Step 4: Provide feedback

If the unsuccessful bidders request feedback on their bid, the evaluation panel should provide constructive feedback that explains why their bid was not successful. This can help the bidder to improve their bid for future procurement opportunities.

Step 5: Conduct due diligence

Before awarding the contract, the organisation should conduct due diligence on the preferred provider(s) to ensure that they meet all the necessary requirements, such as legal and financial requirements, and that they have the capacity and resources to deliver the required services or products.

By selecting preferred providers and developing, justifying, and documenting recommendations, the evaluation panel can ensure that the procurement process is fair, transparent, and objective. It can also help to mitigate any potential risks or issues with the procurement and ensure that the preferred provider(s) are capable of delivering the required services or products. 

How to develop recommendations based on the selection criteria

To develop recommendations based on the selection criteria, the evaluation panel should consider the strengths and weaknesses of each bid against the selection criteria. This will help the panel to identify the preferred provider(s) that best meet the requirements of the organisation.

The recommendations should be presented in a clear and concise format, and should include the following information:

1. The name of the preferred provider(s): This should be clearly identified in the recommendation.
2. The selection criteria: The recommendation should explain how each preferred provider meets the selection criteria. This should be done in a clear and concise manner, and should provide evidence to support the evaluation.
3. The strengths and weaknesses of each bid: The recommendation should provide a summary of the strengths and weaknesses of each bid against the selection criteria. This can help the organisation to make an informed decision.
4. Justification for the recommendation: The recommendation should include a justification for why the preferred provider(s) were selected. This can include information on the preferred provider's experience, technical capabilities, price, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and any other relevant factors
5. Risks and mitigation measures: The recommendation should also identify any potential risks associated with the preferred provider(s), and suggest mitigation measures to address these risks.

The format of the recommendation may vary depending on the organisation's procurement process and requirements. However, it is important that the recommendation is presented in a clear and concise manner, and includes all the necessary information to support the selection of the preferred provider(s). The recommendation may be presented in a written report or a presentation format, depending on the organisation's preferences. 

After the evaluation panel has selected a preferred provider and developed recommendations for the allocation of business against selection criteria, the next step is to obtain the necessary approvals from relevant stakeholders to proceed with the procurement process.

The approvals required may vary depending on the organisation's procurement policies, the value of the contract, and the nature of the goods or services being procured. Some common examples of stakeholders who may need to provide approval include:

• Procurement team: The procurement team may need to provide approval to ensure that the procurement process has been conducted in accordance with the organisation's procurement policies and procedures.
• Finance team: The finance team may need to provide approval to ensure that the procurement process is financially viable and aligns with the organisation's budget.
• Legal team: The legal team may need to provide approval to ensure that the procurement process complies with relevant laws and regulations.
• Senior management: Senior management may need to provide approval to ensure that the procurement process aligns with the organisation's strategic objectives.

Once the necessary approvals have been obtained, the organisation can proceed to notify the successful bidder and initiate the contracting process.

It's important to note that obtaining approvals can be a complex process, and may involve significant documentation and communication with relevant stakeholders. It's therefore essential to plan and manage this step carefully to ensure that the procurement process proceeds smoothly and efficiently.

Some of the factors that can make this process complex are:

Communication channels for obtaining approval 

Effective communication channels and documentation are essential to obtaining approvals for recommended offers. Some of the communication channels that may be used include:

Documentation that may be required for obtaining approval

• Evaluation reports: Evaluation reports that detail the selection criteria, scores, and recommended offer.
• Budget reports: Budget reports that detail the financial viability of the recommended offer.
• Compliance reports: Compliance reports that demonstrate that the procurement process has been conducted in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.
• Approval forms: Approval forms that document the approvals obtained from stakeholders.

The final step in the process of selecting preferred providers is to notify the successful providers. Once approvals have been obtained for the recommended offers, the procurement team should promptly notify the successful providers that they have been selected. This notification should include details about the award of the contract, such as the scope of work, terms and conditions, and timelines.

It is important to provide clear and concise information to the successful providers, as this will help to build a positive relationship and avoid any misunderstandings. The notification should also include instructions on what the successful providers need to do next, such as signing a contract or providing additional information.

In some cases, unsuccessful providers may also need to be notified. This notification should be handled sensitively and provide feedback on why their offer was not selected. Providing feedback can help unsuccessful providers to improve their bids in the future and promote fairness and transparency in the procurement process.

Effective communication is key to successfully notifying successful and unsuccessful providers. The communication should be timely, clear, and transparent. The procurement team should be prepared to answer any questions or concerns that providers may have and be open to feedback to continually improve the procurement process.

The channels of communication used to notify successful and unsuccessful providers

The channels of communication used to notify successful and unsuccessful providers can vary depending on the size and complexity of the procurement process, the number of bidders, and the preferences of the providers. Some channels of communication that can be used include:

• Email: Email is a quick and efficient way to communicate with providers. The email should include all relevant details about the award of the contract, such as the scope of work, timelines, and terms and conditions. The email should also provide instructions on what the successful provider needs to do next, such as signing a contract or providing additional information.
• Phone calls: A phone call can be a more personal way to communicate with providers and can be especially useful for more complex procurements. The procurement team can use phone calls to answer any questions that providers may have and to provide additional information.
• Meetings: Face-to-face meetings can be useful for larger procurements or when dealing with key providers. The procurement team can use meetings to discuss the award of the contract and to provide feedback to unsuccessful providers.
• Letters: A formal letter can be used to notify providers of the award of the contract. The letter should include all relevant details and instructions and should be sent as soon as possible after the decision has been made.

The choice of communication channel will depend on a number of factors, including the size and complexity of the procurement process, the preferences of the providers, and the resources available to the procurement team. Email is often the most efficient and widely used channel of communication, as it allows for quick and easy communication with providers. However, phone calls and meetings can be useful for more complex procurements or when dealing with key providers.

Regardless of the communication channel used, it is important to provide clear and concise information to the providers and to be available to answer any questions or concerns that they may have. Effective communication can help to build positive relationships with providers and promote fairness and transparency in the procurement process.

Quiz